Why versioning AI agents is the CIO’s next big challenge

As artificial intelligence continues its rapid evolution, a new paradigm is emerging, one where autonomous, goal-driven agents operate with increasing independence, adaptability and contextual awareness. These agentic AI systems are not just executing tasks; they are reasoning, planning and orchestrating actions across complex environments. With this shift comes a new challenge: how do we version agentic AI agents?

In my previous article, A practical guide to agentic AI deployment, I talked about moving to a software development lifecycle consisting of experiment and build, evaluate and test, adapt, transition to the deployment environment, continue to test, version and repeat. Add to that that, on average, the AI model lifecycle is less than 18 months, so it becomes imperative to create an agent versioning strategy.

Traditional software versioning strategies, anchored in static codebases and predictable release cycles, fall short when applied to agentic systems. These agents may learn from experience, update their internal models or even reconfigure their toolchains in response to dynamic goals. Their behavior is shaped not only by code but by memory, context and interaction history. As a result, versioning an agent is no longer just about tracking code changes. It’s about capturing the evolution of behavior, intent and capability. An AI implementation strategy is no longer optional but essential for organizations, and the most critical component of this strategy is a comprehensive approach to agent versioning and rollback capabilities. These systems act as safety nets, allowing organizations to quickly revert to stable versions when new deployments cause unforeseen issues.

This article explores the emerging discipline of agent versioning: how to define, manage and govern the lifecycle of AI agents. We’ll examine the unique challenges posed by agentic systems, outline practical versioning strategies and processes that align with your enterprise needs. Whether you’re building agents for customer support, operations or innovation, understanding how to version them effectively is key to ensuring trust, traceability and continuous improvement.

What makes agent versioning different

To start with, we need to understand what makes agent versioning different. Versioning in traditional software (and machine learning systems) is predominantly deterministic. It is anchored in static codebases and predictable release cycles. Agentic AI, by contrast, introduces a new level of complexity. These agents are not just executing instructions; they are reasoning, adapting and evolving in response to dynamic environments. This shift requires a rethinking of how we define and manage versions. We need to be thinking about and planning for the following:

Agent behavior

Agentic agents’ behavior is affected through the model used and its version, the prompt and system context, and tool availability through model context protocol (MCP) calls. This introduces variability, and new versions may be required when developers continue to tweak the prompts for optimal responses. It is essential that, when versioning agents, you are comparing multiple versions side by side, ensuring a comparison to a measured baseline. 

Stateful and contextual behavior

Agentic AI agents often maintain memory across interactions, enabling them to build context, learn user preferences and refine strategies over time. This state means that versioning must account for code and model changes as well as memory snapshots and contextual embeddings. A new version may behave differently, not because of a code change, but because of accumulated experience. It is important to remember that AI systems are non-deterministic, and the outputs can vary even with the same prompts.

Autonomy and self-modification

Unlike static models, agentic systems may modify their own behavior through reflection, planning or tool selection. This introduces the possibility of agents evolving independently of their original design. Versioning must capture not just what the agent was built to do, but what it has become through interaction. We also need to capture version changes to tool calls through MCP endpoints, as well as functions called from the function calling capabilities of the model.

Tool and API dependencies

Agentic agents often rely on external tools, APIs or plugins to complete tasks. These dependencies may change independently of the agent itself, which will create versioning challenges around compatibility, observability and rollback. A minor API update could significantly alter an agent’s behavior, even if the agent’s core logic remains unchanged.

Multi-agent coordination

In many enterprise scenarios, agents do not operate in isolation. Multi-agent systems collaborate, delegate and orchestrate tasks across a network of other agents. Versioning in this context must account for inter-agent dependencies and inter-agent communication, ensuring that updates to one agent do not break the behavior of the collective group of agents. We need to be thinking about whether all the agents for the solution are getting updated as a group or individually. We also need to consider which team in the organization owns the agents, if they are being shared across the enterprise. Will the new version of the shared agent interfere with other systems calling those agents?

Behavioral drift and emergence

Because agentic systems are non-deterministic and adaptive, their behavior can drift over time. This makes it difficult to define a “version” purely in terms of code or configuration. Instead, versioning must include behavioral baselines, test trajectories and performance metrics that reflect how the agent behaves in everyday activities. You need to include automated tests for evaluations, performance and comparison to baselines to identify any drift.

Now that we have covered the ways that versioning agents are different than traditional versioning, we can look at strategies that can be implemented.

Strategies for agent versioning

Versioning agentic AI agents requires more than tagging releases with a version number. It requires a thoughtful approach to managing behavioral evolution, memory and orchestration logic. The items below are strategies that organizations can adopt to ensure safe, traceable and scalable agent versioning.

• Immutable agents. Freezing agents at deployment for auditability and rollback. This strategy has you treat each deployed agent as immutable. Once released, it cannot be altered. This guarantees that behavior can be traced and reproduced as it occurred and works in environments where regulatory or compliance is required, with the ability for reproducibility and auditability.
• Semantic versioning for agents. Applying major/minor/patch logic to behavioral and architectural changes. This provides a consistent framework to communicate the scope and impact of any changes. It also allows consumers of the agent to understand the scope and impact of any changes as they incorporate the agent into their solution. This provides the ability to track compatibility of agents with tools and their versions, as well as track each version to a risk level, test coverage and known limitations. This metadata should be stored in an agent registry and linked to the deployment pipeline.
• Forking and branching. Create forks of agents for experimentation, A/B testing or domain-specific adaptations. This enables experimentation and parallel development of agent variants without disrupting production agents. The forking strategy provides an additional benefit of splitting agent usage for different customer segments or business units, such as V1.1 enterprise and V1.1 retail.
• Shadow agents. This strategy has you deploy a new agent version in a shadow mode alongside the production agent in order to observe the new agent version’s behavior without affecting any outcomes. This reduces risks by validating changes in a live environment and running the new versions in parallel for A/B testing and safety validation.
• Rollback protocols. Create a process to revert to a known-good state if the new version introduces a regression or compliance issue. This is designed for graceful degradation and recovery for continuity in business-critical solutions.

Putting these strategies into place requires tooling for implementation and automation. The tools need to extend beyond the traditional deployment pipelines. Tooling must also support traceability, observability and governance at every stage of the lifecycle. The tools below focus on three areas: agent registries, CI/CD for agents and observability.

Tooling infrastructure

Implement an agent registry. This is a centralized registry that acts as the source of truth for all agents, their purpose, version, limitations and more. Registries also help enable traceability and facilitate collaboration across teams. There are several agent registries, but here are two options for those who want something turnkey or a custom implementation.

• Azure AI Foundry. This provides a framework for building and managing an agentic AI system and includes many tools, including an agent registry that supports dynamic discovery, version control and policy enforcement, as well as integration with MCP endpoints and interfaces, along with governance integration.
• Build your own implementation using a FastAPI-based agent registry server. This implementation uses FastAPI, which allows teams to build custom agent registries utilizing agent-to-agent (A2A) discovery and collaboration. This process utilizes the A2A agent cards that describe agent capabilities.

Incorporate tooling to create and automate CI/CD pipelines for the agents. These pipelines must be adapted for an agentic system and need to provide automated testing of agent behavior, validating toolchain compatibility and API dependencies, provide a controlled rollout mechanism (such as shadow agents or canary deployments), and must integrate with observability and rollback processes you put in place. Listed are three tools that provide these capabilities.

• Azure DevOps Pipelines. Azure DevOps pipelines support agent pools and build orchestration for scalable deployments. Managed identity integration as well as the ability to treat the pipelines configuration and settings as Infrastructure-as-Code (IaC) with support for Terraform, Bicep and ARM templates, allowing you to check the code into your code repositories.
• GitHub Actions. GitHub Actions are very useful for agentic workflows that include native support for containerized deployments using Docker and integration with Kubernetes for scalable agent hosting. It also provides version control of prompts, model configuration and dependencies as part of the CI/CD flow.
• Jenkins. Jenkins is also a flexible platform that provides custom pipeline scripting as well as integration with legacy systems and uses a plug-in-based extensibility for AI-specific workflows.

Place observability and telemetry capabilities everywhere. Monitoring the agent behavior across versions is essential to detect drift, regression and any emergent risks. The system should monitor real-time telemetry on agent decisions, tool usage, performance metrics, as well as compare versions to the behavioral baseline and provide alerts and anomaly detection.

• Azure Monitor and AI Foundry Observability. Azure Monitor provides the core telemetry backend while AI Foundry provides a scenario-optimized dashboard for both generative AI and agentic workloads. OpenTelemetry is also supported. The combination of these services enables unified tracing, cost tracking and safety evaluations across agent runs.
• Langfuse. Langfuse is a specialized observability tool for LLM-based agents that track performance, cost, user interaction and decision traces. It integrates with frameworks like LangChain & LangGraph, Flowise and OpenAI agents.

As with any activity, we measure where we currently are and put a plan together for further growth. The tools listed above will help you on that path. As you evaluate where you are and where you want to go, it can be helpful to utilize a maturity model. 

A maturity model for agent versioning

Many AI maturity models have been created, and I encourage you to evaluate those. However, as you plan your agentic implementations, you will want something focused specifically on agent versioning. This section is specifically focused on versioning. In the previous section, I mentioned that some strategies will overlap, and you may implement aspects over time. Every organization will adapt as it continues to implement agentic AI, and the versioning practices will evolve through distinct stages of maturity. This model will help you and your technical leaders assess where you are today and what capabilities are needed next to ensure safe, scalable and purpose-built agent lifecycle management. 

As you use this model, assess your current practices across agent types and business units. Align versioning maturity with the criticality and autonomy of each agent. Advance through the model incrementally by investing in tooling, governance and cross-functional collaboration. Also realize that you may not need to level in all your agentic solutions. Different teams and implementations may adhere to different levels of maturity, and you may decide going beyond level 3 doesn’t provide the business value. Therefore, getting to a level where agentic solutions need to have agents participating in their own lifecycle management may be reserved for select teams or implementations.

In following the maturity model, guidance and practices consistently, your AI agents will move from “usually works” to “never breaks.” When regressions occur, you’ll instantly know where, why and how to fix them with one-click rollbacks ready and waiting.

10 recommendations for CIOs

As Agentic AI agents become integral to enterprise operations, CIOs must lead the charge in establishing robust versioning practices that balance innovation with governance. I have listed below a set of strategic recommendations to guide CIOs in shaping agent versioning policies and activities:

1. Treat agent versioning as a first-class discipline

• Elevate agent versioning to the same level of importance as software release management and model lifecycle governance.
• Establish dedicated policies and frameworks for agent versioning that span development, deployment and retirement.
• Version everything, including training code, test cases, configuration and dependencies together

2. Define clear versioning boundaries

• Clarify what constitutes a new version: changes in behavior or new features, memory, toolchain or environment.
• Be careful to avoid ambiguous versioning by enforcing semantic versioning standards tailored to each agentic system.

3. Invest in agent registries and metadata management

• Implement centralized registries to track agent versions, lineage, dependencies and governance metadata.
• Ensure each version and each agent includes audit trails, approval records and risk classifications.

4. Enable safe experimentation through forking and shadowing

• Support parallel development of agent variants via branching and forking strategies.
• Use shadow agents to validate new behaviors in production environments without impacting outcomes.
• Perform unit tests systematically for targeted improvements and integration tests regularly to maintain end-to-end integrity.

5. Build rollback-ready infrastructure

• Maintain rollback snapshots that include behavioral logic, memory state and tool configurations.
• Automate rollback protocols to ensure resilience in case of regressions or compliance violations.
• Establish rollback triggers and rules that include rollback thresholds based on business and technical KPI’s.

6. Align versioning with risk and compliance

• Classify agent versions by risk level and apply version-aware guardrails.
• Ensure that high-risk agents undergo rigorous testing and human-in-the-loop oversight before deployment.

7. Monitor behavioral drift and performance across versions

• Deploy observability pipelines to detect drift, regressions and non-expected behaviors.
• Use telemetry to compare agent performance across versions and quantify deployment to automate approval through metrics collected.
• Ensure that you are preventing log contamination by including the agent version in logs to understand which version produced which response.

8. Prepare for any regulatory scrutiny

• Align versioning practices with emerging AI regulations (e.g., EU AI Act, industry-specific standards).
• Maintain documentation and behavioral baselines to demonstrate compliance and readiness.

9. Foster cross-functional collaboration

• Engage stakeholders from engineering, compliance, product and legal teams in versioning governance.
• Promote shared understanding of agent capabilities, risks and lifecycle responsibilities.
• Embrace resilience and celebrate deployments, near misses and continual learning.

10. Transitioning to your deployment environment

• Deploy through a multi-layered environment strategy that includes a ring deployment model consisting of:
  • An inner ring to test the deployment and behavior of the new version.
  • A middle ring that includes trusted users to exercise the solution with real-world data and processes to ensure the solution behaves correctly before turning the solution over to the full user base.
  • An outer ring that consists of the full rollout continuing with monitoring, continual testing and comparing to baseline functionality.
• Lastly, keep the previous deployment active for a duration if you need to perform a quick revert. Or keep automated rollback triggers active for redeployment, if needed, after the previous deployment is removed.

Agent versioning is a must-have, not a nice-to-have

Agentic AI agents represent a transformative shift in enterprise technology, and as agentic AI agents become more autonomous, adaptive and embedded in enterprise workflows, versioning emerges as a cornerstone of responsible innovation. Unlike traditional software or static models, agentic systems evolve through interaction, memory and orchestration, making their lifecycle management uniquely complex and critically important.

Effective versioning is not just about tracking changes; it’s about ensuring continuity, accountability and trust. From defining agent identity and behavioral snapshots to implementing rollback protocols and governance guardrails, organizations must adopt multidimensional strategies that reflect the dynamic nature of these systems. Versioning and rollbacks are must-haves in your environment, not nice-to-haves.

For CIOs and technical leaders, the path forward is clear: treat agent versioning as a first-class discipline, invest in the strategies to support it and align practices with business goals. By doing so, enterprises can unlock the full potential of agentic AI and be confident that every version is not only better but safer.

This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network.
Want to join?